A corporate scene with the stakeholders rejecting an "ESG cost" ball

No One Wants to Assume the Cost of ESG: Redesigning ESG Cost Allocation

January 15, 20257 min read

No One Wants to Assume the Cost of ESG: Redesigning ESG Cost Allocation

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles are at the forefront of the global business agenda, promising sustainable growth, ethical practices, and enhanced long-term value. Yet, beneath this noble vision lies a harsh reality: no one wants to bear the costs of ESG implementation. The burden of regulations, compliance, and expertise often falls unevenly across stakeholders, creating disincentives, particularly for middle market companies, while limiting growth and financing opportunities.

To unlock ESG’s potential, the financial ecosystem must rethink its approach to cost distribution, regulatory consistency, and incentives. Here, we explore the challenges and opportunities for middle market companies and propose a progressive framework for sharing financial and operational burdens among all stakeholders, from wealth managers to investors.


The Challenges: Why ESG Costs Stifle Growth

1. Regulatory Complexity and Inconsistency

  • Fragmented Frameworks: Companies face a labyrinth of ESG standards and frameworks, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). These frameworks often overlap or conflict, leaving companies scrambling to determine compliance priorities.

  • Regional Variances: ESG regulations differ significantly across states in the U.S., creating compliance challenges for businesses operating across jurisdictions.

  • Evolving Standards: Frequent updates to ESG requirements demand continuous adjustments, increasing compliance costs.

2. Disproportionate Burden on Middle Market Companies

  • Limited Resources: Middle market companies lack the financial and operational capacity to hire dedicated ESG teams or implement sophisticated reporting systems.

  • Supply Chain Pressures: Larger corporations push ESG requirements onto their suppliers, many of which are middle market firms, without providing financial or technical support.

  • Access to Capital: Investors often prioritize large corporations with established ESG credentials, leaving middle market companies struggling to secure financing.

3. Unwillingness to Pay for ESG Expertise

  • Cost Aversion: Wealth managers and allocators hesitate to shoulder the costs of ESG integration, citing high implementation expenses and uncertain returns.

  • Investor Reluctance: While investors demand ESG alignment, few are willing to pay the premium required for detailed ESG research, data management, and certifications.

4. Greenwashing Risks

  • Without adequate resources to meet stringent ESG standards, some companies resort to greenwashing—making exaggerated or false claims about sustainability—which erodes trust and credibility across the ecosystem.


Opportunities: Redesigning ESG Cost Allocation

1. Progressive Financial Framework

A tiered financial model can align costs with company size and investment scale:

  • Seed and Early-Stage Companies: Minimal ESG requirements to encourage innovation and growth, with funding for basic compliance provided by investors or government grants.

  • Middle Market Companies: Incremental ESG milestones tied to financing stages, with support for implementation costs from wealth managers and allocators.

  • Large Corporations: Advanced ESG standards funded through their greater financial capacity and economies of scale.

2. Innovating with ESG Support: Examples from Investment Firms

Several U.S.-based investment firms are pioneering approaches to support their pipeline companies’ ESG transitions, particularly in the social and governance dimensions:

  • HCAP Partners: This private equity firm focuses on lower middle market companies and integrates their “Gainful Jobs Approach,” which prioritizes employee well-being, diversity, and fair compensation. By embedding these social principles into their investment strategy, HCAP helps companies improve their workforce practices while enhancing long-term value.

  • KKR’s ESG Program: KKR provides hands-on support to its portfolio companies by developing customized ESG action plans. Beyond environmental factors, the firm emphasizes governance improvements such as enhancing board diversity, strengthening anti-corruption measures, and fostering transparent decision-making.

  • Bain Capital Double Impact: Bain focuses on companies that have the potential for both financial success and measurable social impact, providing them with resources to improve governance practices, workforce diversity, and operational transparency.

  • Ardian’s Sustainability Commitment: Ardian integrates ESG principles throughout its investment process, prioritizing governance structures, transparent reporting, and stakeholder engagement to help companies transition sustainably.

  • Goldman Sachs Urban Investment Group: This group focuses on funding projects that drive community development, emphasizing strong governance frameworks and equitable social impact.

3. Public Programs Supporting ESG Transitions

Governments and public-private partnerships (PPPs) in the U.S. offer significant resources to help companies adopt ESG principles, particularly in social and governance areas:

  • U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Loan Programs: Offers financing to businesses implementing energy efficiency and renewable energy projects, while encouraging companies to adopt robust governance frameworks to manage these projects effectively.

  • Small Business Administration (SBA) Green Loans: Provides capital for small and medium-sized businesses to adopt environmentally friendly practices, including operational and governance improvements that align with broader ESG goals.

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Grant Programs: Supports initiatives that promote community engagement and sustainable practices, often integrating social aspects such as local job creation and diversity initiatives.

  • New Markets Tax Credit Program (NMTC): Incentivizes community development and economic growth by offering tax credits to investors in low-income communities, with an emphasis on social and governance aspects.

  • Opportunity Zones Program: Encourages investment in economically distressed communities through tax incentives, requiring projects to demonstrate clear social and governance benefits such as job creation and community development.

  • Corporate Governance Reform Initiatives: State-level programs, such as those in Delaware and California, incentivize companies to adopt transparent governance practices, including board diversity and executive accountability.

Opportunities for Companies to Access Public-Private Programs

  • Collaborative Projects: Businesses can partner with local governments to access funding and resources while demonstrating community impact.

  • ESG Alignment as a Qualification: Many programs require basic ESG compliance, encouraging companies to begin integrating social and governance elements early.

  • Access to Expertise: Public programs often provide technical assistance to help companies meet ESG standards, reducing operational burdens.

4. Incentives for Wealth Managers and Allocators

  • Performance-Based Compensation: Wealth managers could earn higher fees for successfully guiding companies through ESG integration milestones.

  • Tax Incentives: Governments could offer tax breaks or subsidies for wealth managers investing in ESG-aligned funds.

  • Recognition Programs: Industry awards for wealth managers and allocators excelling in ESG implementation could enhance their reputations and client acquisition potential.

5. Standardization and Simplification

  • Unified Frameworks: A consistent U.S.-wide ESG standard would reduce complexity and compliance costs.

  • Sector-Specific Guidelines: Tailoring ESG requirements to industry-specific risks and opportunities would make implementation more practical and impactful.

6. Investor Willingness to Share Costs

  • Impact Premiums: Investors could pay a premium for funds that achieve measurable ESG outcomes, recognizing the added value of sustainability.

  • Blended Finance Models: Combining concessional capital from government programs with private investment could lower the cost of capital for ESG-aligned projects.

7. Leveraging Technology for Efficiency

  • AI-Driven ESG Tools: Automated tools for data collection, analysis, and reporting can reduce administrative costs and improve accuracy.

  • Blockchain for Transparency: Blockchain technology can enhance supply chain visibility and ESG compliance, building trust among investors and stakeholders.


Proposed Framework for Financial and Operational Burden Sharing

Stage 1: Early Growth (Startup Phase)

  • Focus: Basic ESG awareness and compliance.

  • Support: Grants, seed capital, and investor-funded training.

  • Costs: Primarily borne by investors and public subsidies.

Stage 2: Scaling (Middle Market Phase)

  • Focus: Incremental adoption of ESG practices, including governance improvements and initial reporting.

  • Support: Conditional financing tied to ESG milestones, technical assistance from wealth managers.

  • Costs: Shared between companies (operational improvements) and investors (training, certifications).

Stage 3: Maturity (Large Corporate Phase)

  • Focus: Advanced ESG integration, full compliance with U.S. and state-level standards.

  • Support: Institutional funding for large-scale initiatives.

  • Costs: Predominantly borne by the company, with performance-based fees for wealth managers.


Conclusion: Balancing Challenges and Opportunities

The current ESG ecosystem places an unsustainable burden on middle market companies, stifling growth and deterring participation. To unlock the true potential of ESG, the financial system must adopt a more balanced approach, distributing costs and responsibilities equitably among stakeholders.

Wealth managers and allocators must lead the charge by absorbing more of the upfront financial and expertise costs, while investors need to recognize the long-term value of ESG alignment and be willing to pay for it. By leveraging progressive frameworks, standardized metrics, and innovative financing models—as demonstrated by firms like HCAP Partners, KKR, Bain Capital Double Impact, and Goldman Sachs Urban Investment Group—and tapping into public programs such as SBA Green Loans, NMTC, and Opportunity Zones, the ecosystem can create an environment where sustainability and profitability coexist, driving meaningful change across all levels of the U.S. economy.


At Middle Market Network, We vet experts and investors, so you don't have to.

❤️


✅ 🔎 Access our directory of Middle Market Experts for free. 🔍 ✅

Go to: https://middlemarketjournal.com/experts-middle-market

Are you a Middle Market Expert? Apply at: https://middlemarketjournal.com/expert-invitation


➡️ Mind Your Own Business ⬅️

Subscribe to our exclusive content for only $15:

https://middlemarketjournal.com/journal-new-subscription


🇺🇸 Make America Make Again 🇺🇸

Funding over $10 mn – Submit Your Proposal

If you're an American company looking for growth capital over $10 million, you cannot miss the Alternative Financing and Investment Tour, an initiative to connect middle-market companies in national priority sectors with private and institutional investors.

Submit your proposal or request for Funding and Partnerships

https://usaeconomicforum.com/


Become part of our Network of business owners, experts, and investors!

Founder of Middle Market Journal® & USA Economic Forum® and Financing and Investment Tour. 
Atty. | Business Strategist & Advisor to Middle and Large Enterprises for Growth, Innovation and Wealth Preservation.

Tash Salas

Founder of Middle Market Journal® & USA Economic Forum® and Financing and Investment Tour. Atty. | Business Strategist & Advisor to Middle and Large Enterprises for Growth, Innovation and Wealth Preservation.

Back to Blog