What Starts in NYC shapes the world sigh of a bus stop in NYC

Immigrants, Lawyers, Entrepreneurs, Women: Beware Mamdani

August 30, 20252 min read

The new face of the Democratic Party in NYC is a clear reflection of the extremist views of its younger members.

A generation of pot heads, easily offended, and good-for-nothings, according to their parents.

The generation of digital activists, influencers, and business people who refuse to get a real job. This segment is Mamdani’s (@ZohranKMomdani) super weapon.

People who want to feel meaningful, compassionate, virtuous without doing the work, nor being exposed to reality. The members of the New Church of Virtue-Signaling Nonsense and Religion of the Self.

It is unfair to say it is an entire generation. There are segments of the population that are in absolute poverty, without a family home to house them until they are 45, that participate in the daily economy and still live paycheck to paycheck, and are drowning in debt.

This segment is the second one that Mamdani appeals to — the disadvantaged who live in a constant state of survival, and their most primitive, raw, and unfiltered fears lead their actions.

“CHANGE! HELP!” they ask.

While Mamdani, the Progressive Priesthood, shows up and listens, the independent candidate, Jim Walden (@JimWalden_esq) , a nice man, bores the entire world with economic theories that are above everyone’s pay grade.

Meanwhile, the other candidates eliminate themselves:

Eric Adams (@ericadamsfornyc) is running as an independent, known as a face of corruption.

Curtis Sliwa (@CurtisSliwa) is the legacy of angry Republicans with double standards — his partner’s profile tells you directly, “If you eat animals, you’re the problem.” Another virtue signaling standing closer to the New Democratic Church than the Republican Billionaires Boys Club.

And then we have Andrew Cuomo (Andrew Cuomo; X: @andrewcuomo), my personal choice, but not an easy one.

While Mamdani is a good member of the New Democratic Church, the unsurfaced risk of choosing him, Adams, or Sliwa is easily explained with 3 different scenarios:

Adams wins: Well… I almost got into projecting his results, but it’s easier to explain this way: “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.” No Adam. I’m out.

Sliwa wins: Angry old man, with a virtue-signaling partner and zero platform and coalition power. Sorry, Curtis, nice hat though! I’m out.

Mamdani wins: He fights ‘very hard’ for his progressive and nonsensical platform. NYC declines rapidly, especially in security, with his nonsense of defunding the police, and NYC enters federal preemption (override), and Trump now governs us.

Highly likely, since it has been done in Washington. Out by logic and reality. A.K.A. Voting for Mamdani is really voting for Trump (who is kind of doing a good job).

So… Coumo.

I’m voting for Andrew Cuomo, for common sense and the hard truth to swallow, also known as a reality check.

No one should vote for Mamdani, a threat to American business and individual autonomy.


Circles don’t differentiate the leaders at the top 4%. Depth does.

>>> Mind Your Own Business.

Capital Steward of Global Capital Institute Initiatives

Miss Money®

Capital Steward of Global Capital Institute Initiatives

LinkedIn logo icon
Youtube logo icon
Back to Blog